MidnightSunshine531

Member
  • Content count

    1,901
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About MidnightSunshine531

Profile Information

  • Gender Female

Previous Fields

  • MembershipType Survivor

Contact Methods

  • ICQ 0
  1. Why Is Search Flood Control Always On?

    I still can't search for my own effing posts. Am getting extremely frustrated! It's been like this for several WEEKS for me no matter how many times I delete cookies or whatever the hell it still does this and will not allow me to look at my own posts. Not cool. -.-"
  2. Hi All

    welcome back
  3. Hello.

    Welcome to AS! x
  4. Hello.

    Welcome to AS! x
  5. Hi

    Welcome to AS! x
  6. Thank You

    Welcome to AS! x
  7. New And A Little Nervous

    Welcome to AS! x
  8. Hi There

    Welcome to AS! x
  9. A Little Scared.

    Welcome to AS! x
  10. Greetings

    Welcome to AS! x
  11. Sexist Remarks

    exactly. well said!
  12. Sexist Remarks

    hmmmmmmmmm. i can kinda see your point, i dont necessarily agree with your reasoning but thats ok. we dont have to agree. thank you for respecting my opinion though, thats very appreciated! i think that *could* be reasonable, i just would want the mods to make sure and watch those threads very carefully because i wouldnt want both of those threads to turn into nothing but "i hate men" and "i hate women" rants when it really should be about working through that fear and mistrust.. does that make sense? maybe it would be a better idea to make a more general thread about working through fears about certain groups of people in general? i just dont want anyone to feel singled out because thats not fair. and like i said before i think the mods would have to keep a close eye on a thread like that so it doesnt turn into anything but hate speech instead of actually working on that fear/mistrust/etc. i dont know, im kinda rambling so sorry about that. this is a complicated issue, no easy answers. i just think that its not right to paint any one group of people as potential perpetrators because the thing is, anyone can abuse/assault. like i said before rape/sa is not a gender specific crime and should not be treated like it is.. thats all. x
  13. Sexist Remarks

    how would you feel if a whole site of male survivors made a thread about "fear/mistrust of females"? how would you(meaning everyone here) feel if a whole group of people were stereotyping you as a potential perpetrator just because of your gender? it'd make you feel pretty singled out and terrible, yes? *rapists* rape. it is NOT a gender specific crime, on the perpetrating side OR the victim/survivor side.
  14. Invalidation. Words Can Hurt!

    i think someone already mentioned this so sorry to repeat things but one of the worst things for me is to mention it to someone and have them say ABSOLUTELY NOTHING AT ALL.
  15. Sexist Remarks

    Fair enough footnote. I am in a position where I am able to take that fact for granted, but I suppose not everyone does. The idea is to quit projecting personal experience onto everyone and try not to generalize. I think it is also handy to just stay on topic. If a thread is about rape culture and how men might justify their abusive actions toward women, I find it kind of rude when someone feels the need to pipe up and say "WELL YOU KNOW NOT ALL MEN ARE RAPISTS AND SOMETIMES WOMEN ARE, SO THERE." Yeah. I know. It's a topic worth discussing on a different thread, which I'd be happy to consider and participate in. There's room for everybody to be validated here without invalidating other people in the process. No one needs to shove. I'd hope that people would have enough consideration to understand the context of a thread before making those kinds of remarks, but it does still happen. It's a sensitive issue either way, but there's no reason why each aspect of the topic can't be discussed in its place. If the thread is intended for a general audience, then the issue may be up for debate. If it's narrow in its focus (culture and its relationship to male perps justifiying their activities, for example), then obviously the responses would (or should) be accordingly. Exactly. There is a big difference between "I'm having trouble trusting men again" and "all men are miserable, rapist scumbags." The former is indicative of a survivor working through issues and the latter a hurtful generalization and projection onto all men, including male survivors and secondaries who don't deserve to be called rapists. If someone is making obvious, hurtful generalizations (not working through issues) and the thread is out in the forum for access by both male and female survivors alike, then the generalizations CAN and SHOULD be refuted. If it is in the Women's Forum, then it is a clear violation of the TOS and a moderator will end up dealing with it. Hurting is not an excuse to demonize, especially when those being demonized are far outnumbered and a very vulnerable minority in what is supposed to be a safe space for ALL survivors, not just those who are female. Bullying and generalizations are not healthy expressions of pain. If I see it, I'm calling it out or reporting it. Is anyone gonna seriously sit idly by while a male survivor posts that all women are abusive, manipulative liars who just want to hurt women? Really?! I've witnessed far too much callous and intentional secondary wounding at the hands of female survivors to just pretend it is okay any more. After witnessing a male survivor completely fall apart and recoil from his support network, and seriously consider hurting himself over the hatred he witnessed on another survivor network, I think it is time it is addressed head-on rather than excused or glossed over by those in the majority on survivor sites. It is easy to be cavalier when it is not your demographic being demonized on a constant basis. Does anyone ever wonder why so many men join and then disappear quickly? Or many never leave the discussions in the men's forum? Think about it - hard. I highly doubt the same tolerance for generalizations would be granted if the genders were reversed. i completely agree with you. well said, very well said.